The lefts version of birthers?

[merk]

http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/ ... palin.html Some photo's which supposedly show that sarah pallin's son trig might not be the same baby she first showed as being her son. I dont know what to make of it - the pictures seem somewhat compelling - but what would be the point of doing all of that anyhow?

[jcjm]

Give me a break. This is ridiculous, especially in the day of computer enhancement. If the picture is even real or even not somebody elses's baby at the event, it could have been a rash or something else that came and went. This guy is stretching, and for what? Maybe to grind an ax?

[merk]

To be fair - the photo's dont look doctored and they were taken from news sources, not just some random person. Personally i dont really care all that much - i consider it gossip.

[Unique Journalist]

Wow, someone had a lot of time on their hands. This is about as big a waste of time as the frantic search for President Obama's birth certificate.

[jcjm]

The pictures may be from news sources, but they are on his site, so he could have taken the news fotos and doctored them. Or maybe they are someone elses baby which had different captions and he is taking it out of context. Or maybe it was just a skin problem that came and went. Or maybe..... on and on. Something always sounds fishy to me when as Unique implied, someone takes so much time to make something out of nothing.

[merk]

*shrug* i dont think the photo's themselves are fishy. But then again, like i said, i consider this to be nothing more then gossip. I already have enough reasons to dismiss palin - i dont need to add baby swapping to the list